March 30, 2006

Thermodynamics

A professor of mine, Dr. Cimbala, has an interesting essay on his webpage about the existence of God and thermodynamics. Although a thermodynamics and fluid mechanics professor at Penn State, he's a fundamentalist Christian who believes that Genesis is the literal truth. Funny thing is that in college, he was an atheist. Well here's the essay:
Does the Second Law of Thermodynamics Prove the Existence of God?

John M. Cimbala
Professor of Mechanical Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University


In this short article, I summarize my ideas about the second law of thermodynamics, and why I believe it points to a creator God.

This article also appears in the book In Six Days - Why Fifty Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation, edited by John F. Ashton, and published by Master Books, Green Forest, AR. Copyright 2000 by John F. Ashton. It is available on-line from Answers in Genesis.

A formal definition of the second law of thermodynamics is "In any closed system, a process proceeds in a direction such that the unavailable energy (the entropy) increases." In other words, in any closed system, the amount of disorder always increases with time. Things progress naturally from order to disorder, or from an available energy state to one where energy is more unavailable. A good example: a hot cup of coffee cools off in an insulated room. The total amount energy in the room remains the same (which satisfies the first law of thermodynamics). Energy is not lost, it is simply transferred (in the form of heat) from the hot coffee to the cool air, warming up the air slightly. When the coffee is hot, there is available energy because of the temperature difference between the coffee and the air. As the coffee cools down, the available energy is slowly turned to unavailable energy. At last, when the coffee is room temperature, there is no temperature difference between the coffee and the air, i.e. the energy is all in an unavailable state. The closed system (consisting of the room and the coffee) has suffered what is technically called a "heat death." The system is "dead" because no further work can be done since there is no more available energy. The second law says that the reverse cannot happen! Room temperature coffee will not get hot all by itself, because this would require turning unavailable energy into available energy.

Now consider the entire universe as one giant closed system. Stars are hot, just like the cup of coffee, and are cooling down, losing energy into space. The hot stars in cooler space represent a state of available energy, just like the hot coffee in the room. However, the second law of thermodynamics requires that this available energy is constantly changing to unavailable energy. In another analogy, the entire universe is winding down like a giant wind-up clock, ticking down and losing available energy. Since energy is continually changing from available to unavailable energy, someone had to give it available energy in the beginning! (I.e. someone had to wind up the clock of the universe at the beginning.) Who or what could have produced energy in an available state in the first place? Only someone or something not bound by the second law of thermodynamics. Only the creator of the second law of thermodynamics could violate the second law of thermodynamics, and create energy in a state of availability in the first place.

As time goes forward (assuming things continue as they are), the available energy in the universe will eventually turn into unavailable energy. At this point, the universe will be said to have suffered a heat death, just like the coffee in the room. The present universe, as we know it, cannot last forever. Furthermore, imagine going backwards in time. Since the energy of the universe is constantly changing from a state of availability to one of less availability, the further back in time one goes, the more available the energy of the universe. Using the clock analogy again, the further back in time, the more wound up the clock. Far enough back in time, the clock was completely wound up. The universe therefore cannot be infinitely old. One can only conclude that the universe had a beginning, and that beginning had to have been caused by someone or something operating outside of the known laws of thermodynamics.

Is this scientific proof for the existence of a Creator God? I think so. Evolutionary theories of the universe cannot counteract the above arguments for the existence of God. Evidence such as this helped to convince me to believe in God, and to accept His plan of salvation through His son Jesus Christ. For further detailes about my conversion to Christianity, I have written a short testimony.
That's an interesting take even though I don't support it. But dammit Dr. Cimbala, you are one of the elite science based professors in the country with numerous papers and books out on the topic of fluid flow and thermodynamics. How can you abandon the science based sect that defends the big bang theory?

Tags: , , , &

March 28, 2006

Speechless

Holy crap. Someone allowed Sean Hannity to join the collective blog I belong to. What the hell? Whoever let him into the blog is gonna get a punch in the face. Check out his post.

Tags: , &

March 23, 2006

Floppy

Gateway has released a brand new all-in-one computer that has expansion bays which is an interesting feature typically not found on all-in-ones. Aside from it being just plain ugly, I have a question.


Who the hell still uses floppy drives and why do PC companies still include these horrifically obselete and crappy devices? Get a goddamn usb stick. They have 500 times the capacity and don't break when bended slightly. Come on PC companies, its your chance to save $6 on every computer you sell. Idiots.

Tags: , , , &

Bridge

This is the craziest feat of engineering that I've seen in quite awhile. Just simply amazing. Sadly, its only 14 feet deep so its highly unlikely that any supertankers will be cruising by.

Tags: , , , &

Wireless

A blog entry from Justin, an old roommate of mine, about his company's recent collaboration with GM at its Tech Center to incorporate wireless technology and sensors into cars to make them safer.

Tags: , , , &

Rebranding

General Motors has too many brands selling too many similar models. Allow me to list them all: What's worse is that all these brands, with so many brand engineered models, have destroyed almost all of what initially made them distinct. Secondly, the stereotypical image of some brands due to demographics has severely affected their marketability. What 18-25 year old male wants to buy a Buick? None, well except for Mark who wants a LaCrosse cause he thinks he'll be taken seriously in the corporate world. Sorry Mark, you'll never be taken seriously, so the Buick isn't going to help. Lastly, the diverse and numbered amount of brands has led to consumer confusion and frustration.

Brand loyalty is established at an early but is hard to retain with GM's current portfolio. As people age, loyal owners are expected to stay within the GM family but switch to different divisions. Chevrolet is the economic choice and was designed to be the starting point for car owners. Pontiac, although initially different, has become the "excitement" division. Oldsmobile was a step up from Chevrolet and Buick was the cushy "doctor's car." Cadillac, of course was the "Cadillac of cars" and has remained as the top nameplate within the family for decades.

The problem, in my opinion, is this process no longer works. People want to remain loyal to their brand and when their brand doesn't offer the vehicle they want, even if another division does, there's a huge chance of jumping ship. A prime example is the loyalty and rivalry of Chevrolet and GMC truck owners. GMC owners would never buy a Chevy Truck and vice versa. Even in the engineering centers, this competition and rivalry still carries over from when the brands were developed independently. When I interned at GM's Truck Center in Pontiac, some people scoffed at the "Heartbeat of America" license plate I had hung up in my cubicle. It was retarded, I know.

One thing General Motors needs is a clear brand identity and more importantly brand singularity. The top three growing automotive manufacturers in the US are Toyota, Honda, and Nissan (Update -- it might actually be Kia and Hyundai but let me make my point). Look at their brands. Until recently they each had only two: the normal brand and the luxury brand. Consumers knowing if they want a luxury model or not, have a one stop shopping centers for all their needs. Now look at GM. For consumers who want to remain loyal to the General, they have to cross shop for ordinary vehicles at Saturn, Chevrolet, Saab, Buick, Oldsmobile (ok, its dead now I know), & Pontiac. It's especially confusing when the only differences between many of the cars are body-cladding and badges.

From an engineering standpoint, keeping all these brands is a money pit. Although each division now shares most of the chassis and underlying parts, all their exteriors and interiors are independently produced at five times the cost. This isn't economically viable. Exteriors and interior designs need to be standard across the board with a set design. Differences should be decor details and trim not different instrument panels for each division, although more luxurious models should be made of higher quality and luxurious materials (Buick) but the design should be fluid thus reducing engineering costs. Differing the materials on an instrument panel costs a fraction of what engineering a entire new panel would be.

Another problem of their massive branding is vehicle dilution and the marketability of sales numbers. Quickly, what is the number one selling full size pickup in the United States? It's been the Ford F-150 for over a decade by a large margin (200,000 units in the lead). But if you look closer it's not so clear cut. If you were to combine the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra sales together, the numbers would come out about equal with the F-150. By the way, these two vehicles are identical and for the most part only have differing labels. This best-selling distinction is a marketing goldmine and GM could obtain it. Every year Ford is able to advertise that it has the best selling truck in America. GM needs and could have this publicity.

Want another example? How about GM's Epsilon platform. This platform and its variants produces the Opel Vectra, Saab 9-3, Chevrolet Malibu, Opel Signum, Chevrolet Malibu Maxx, Pontiac G6, Fiat Croma and the upcoming Saturn Aura. Now here's the disadvantage once again. Toyota claims to have the best selling car in America with its Camry selling over 400,000 a year. If GM were to combine all the US models into one brand, the total would come to 340,000 cars (180,000 Malibus, 125,000 G6s, & roughly 35,000 9-3s). This wouldn't take the lead from the Camry but would put it in third place just behind the Honda Accord, ahead of the Honda Civic but most importantly on the list of best-selling vehicles in the US and I think that's a very important status symbol. People pay attention to the best-selling list just like some blindly follow the lame evaluations of Consumer Reports. The mindset is "hey, everyone is buying a Camry, so should I." Simply being on the list could boost sales in the next year. Everyone wants to buy a winner.

So what can be done? Simply, GM needs to combine and rebrand its entire line of cars and trucks to streamline their portfolio, revamp their business model and once again regain profitability. Critics have long discussed how GM needs to kill off some of its brands like Buick and Oldsmobile, which it did. But its not that simple. You can't just kill off brands because you want to, at least not without severe repercussions. If you were to get rid of Pontiac, Buick, and GMC Truck, that would mean the elimination of thousands of dealers across the nation (I'll be ignoring the issue that GM has way too many dealers during this post). The uproar and public relations fiasco would be attrocious.

Therefore, I have put together a plan that would create a better brand singularity without putting half of GM's dealers out of business (even though they should be -- Toyota has roughly half the amount that GM does).

Step Number One
Chevrolet remains as Chevrolet but stops selling the top trim levels and becomes the economic brand with its stereotype of cheap plastic interiors. It will retain nearly all of its current models.

Step Number Two
Pontiac is scraped but the dealers get the Chevrolet Sport trim level to sell. This is effectively all of Chevrolet's SS models. SS is scraped in my opinion because it makes me think of guys with mullets who drive 89' IROC Camaros and chew Skoal. The dealers retain their sporty image and Pontiac dealers thank me for not putting them out of business. The interiors will remain nearly identical to the Chevrolet with the same overall design and materials except for maybe white faced gauges and other items commonly found in Type R cars. Chevrolet Sport will roll out an entire line of upgradable performance parts to get the car enthusiast crowd interested, but most importantly manual transmissions will be available on every car (automatics will be an option too). You can't sell sport edition cars without a manual transmissions. Period. This Chevrolet Sport division will also have upgraded engines over the normal Chevrolet. They'll use the same block but will have turbochargers or superchargers to increase power. Enthusiasts love turbochargers. Its a great way to gain interest and boost power cheaply without designing a new engine. An example of this plan is that while Chevrolet will sell the Corvette, Chevrolet Sport will sell the Corvette Sport, which will be the renamed Covette Z06.

Step Number Three
Buick is scraped because well its image sucks but the dealers will get the Chevrolet Special trim level or something that sounds better. This is effectively a smoother riding mid-luxury Chevrolet. It will have the same interior design except with softer to touch materials and lots of detailed accents. Upgraded sound deadening the doors, better stereo system and things like aluminum trim and higher quality leather seating. The exterior will of course have small changes too. The trim level retains its focus of being the "doctor's car." Think of Chevrolet Special to be like a Chevrolet in LT trim but better. Once again, Buick dealers will thank me for not putting them in the poor house.

Step Number Four
Saturn is scraped but the dealers get the Chevrolet Eco trim level to sell. It will finish what their upcoming Green Line of vehicles will start. Chevrolet Eco will exclusively sell all the hybrid Chevrolet models. They could also sell fuel efficient direct injection diesel engine cars because well, I want one. Yuppie hybrid cars are a perfect fit for the Saturn brand because their dealerships have the best overall feeling inside. Saturn dealerships are actually a nice experience, much unlike most other dealerships including all brands. This "feeling" is suited perfectly to the hippie liberal douche yuppies that currently buy Priuses and think they're saving the planet. Just in case you're wondering --- they're not. Regardless of what they do, oil will continue to be burned until it runs out. In fact if we all drove Prius' and decreased our dependence on oil, it would only plummet the price of oil and people would start buying Hummers again in mass quantities. Oh well, what can you do about hippies? Of course, don't get me wrong, I prefer a fuel efficient vehicle. I want a 50 mpg sedan but I'm not doing it to "save the world" and hurt the evil oil companies. I doing it because I don't want to buy $40 of gas each week. I'll take pragmatism over idealism anyday.

Step Number Five
Goodbye Saab. You'll be sold. You're a money pit and the idea of the key in a place that a cupholder should be is retarded. Adios.

Step Number Six
Cadillac will remain Cadillac.

Step Number Seven
Hummer, probably GM's strongest brand, will remain as it is.

Step Number Eight
GMC Truck will get out of the consumer business and will only focus on the commercial truck business and can continue to use its "Professional Grade Engineering" slogan ad nauseum.

Step Number Nine
Opel, Vauxhall, and Holden ... I'm not sure. In my mind they should become Chevrolet but that probably wouldn't work since some of their markets don't have Chevrolets right now. So I'm skipping over this part.

Now, in case you're wondering what would happen to a lot of the models, here's a spreadsheet of my proposed solution. I'm probably missing some vehicles but you get the point.

Now we have four brands instead of eleven. It still doesn't address the massive dealer problem but it helps. It helps because now the brands have distinct identities. Someone shopping for a sport sedan with lots of power isn't going to shop at Chevrolet Eco -- they're going to go to Chevrolet Sport. This will virtually eliminate the need for consumer cross shopping the numerous GM brands.

What do you think?

Tags: , , , , &

Controller

Well the Playstation controller that we've all grown to love or hate is being shelved for the release of Sony's new PS3. The new controller will be included when the device is released this past Christmas, this spring, I mean maybe this summer.

I actually like the new design. It keeps all the button locations in roughly the same spots and the new boomerang design should make it easier to hold. Personally, I always found the old controller a little strange to grasp. Hopefully, this will make it easier.

Tags: , , ,

March 22, 2006

Chef

If you didn't catch South Park tonight, you missed out. After the recent media events where Tom Cruise supposedly got Viacom to shelve the Scientology episode, Isaac Hayes quit the show because he's a hypocrite and all the hype of the season premiere -- tonight's episode lived up to the speculation.

The analogy of the Super Adventure Club, a club dedicated to hiking and molesting little boys, to Scientology was absolutely hilarious and Darth Chef? comic genius.

Chef is dead, long live Chef.

Tags: , , , &

March 21, 2006

Bias

I brought up in my last post the bias found in Consumer Reports. Their recent evaluation granting all ten categories with Japanese vehicles has raised a lot of questions within the industry. Consumer Reports recently posted a rebuttal to the criticism here. Althought its a rebuttal, one point clearly outlined the bias I was talking about.
Of the domestic manufacturers, Ford has the strongest position in the heart of the sedan market. Even though the Focus’ design is six years old, it was just edged out by the redesigned 2006 Honda Civic as our top-rated small car. We still think the Focus is more enjoyable to drive, with an excellent balance of nimble handling and a comfortable ride, but the Civic is more refined, fuel efficient, and has better crash protection. The Five Hundred is an extremely accommodating, if highly understated, car. The Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan did very well in our tests, but since they are new designs, we can not predict reliability yet. The Fusion/Milan’s decidedly lackluster IIHS crash test results give pause, as well. Likewise, the Ford Freestyle--with impressive interior packaging that offers good room for seven passengers--would have made this list, but our tested AWD model has below average first-year reliability.
That's funny. The Fusion was pretty much eliminated because it was new and reliability could not be predicted -- so it wasn't able to prove itself. But, this wasn't a problem for the new Honda Civic. It was presumed to automatically have superb reliaibility. Just as I have said earlier, Consumer Reports assumes American cars are crap and foreign cars are amazing. I'm not saying that the Fusion should have won, I wasn't involved in the testing and can't produce an objective conclusion. What am I saying is why did the Civic get a pass on reliability? This is the bias.

UPDATE: Here's an image of JD Power's brand dependability study. So, keep on buying your cheap Kia's and Hyundai's and trendy VW's cause you think GM vehicles are unreliable -- and I'll continue to laugh at you.

Tags: , , &

March 20, 2006

Coward

From a Detroit News article:
Lori Queen, a GM executive for small cars, couldn't take it anymore. In an e-mail exchange with Automotive News, she wrote that the editors and reporters who put together the Consumer Reports auto issue are "the most unprofessional group of people I have ever worked with."

She added: "They are totally nonobjective and go to great extremes to paint a picture for their paid subscription readers, who primarily buy Japanese cars.

"They don't consider price or price differences, they don't consider model mix or consumer preferences, they buy the cheapest car they can find (generally), and then base all their opinions on a limited sample."
This brutal exchange has most likely come as a result of Consumer Reports naming a Japanese vehicle in all ten of their categories and its brutal review of the Cobalt.

The reason I bring this up is because GM's CEO, Rick Wagoner, immediately telephoned the head of Consumer Reports to apologize for the comments because Wagoner, or Captain "No Balls" Douchebag, didn't have the cajones to admit that this is, in my opinion, GM's true internal opinion of Consumer Reports.

Message to Rick: Grow a set of balls and admit the truth -- you hate Consumer Reports for their biased subjective opinions. Stop taking cues from the Democratic Party with your spineless public relations and actually voice your opinion.

As a side note, I agree with a lot of what Lori Queen has said. J.D. Power has consistently ranked the Malibu above Japanese products like the Accord and Camry in terms of customer satisfaction, reliability, and quality. It also boasts better performance, power, and fuel economy yet somehow never stacks up well in Consumer Reports. A little too ironic, don't ya think?

An AutoBlog comment sums up perfectly the bias of Consumer Reports:
CR offers another source of information that one can review before purchasing a car. However, their reviews should not be considered the final word on a product. I remember reviews on the GEO Prism/Toyota Corolla twins and the Toyota would score higher on reliability than the Prism, even though the cars were built on the same assembly line.
The most likely reason has to do with the perception the owner has of the car and it could be argued that someone who has Toyota is more likely to keep up with maintenance than someone who owns a GEO (different demographics).
The cars were mirror images of themselves. The only difference was the badge on the front of the car.

Tags: , , , &

Reform

Finally, Congress is considering a reformation of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act which has illegalized technology and methods to circumvent mechanisms that protect copyrighted material. In short, it makes it illegal to rip or backup DVDs just as you would music CDs.

This bill has reduced our rights with regards to the Fair Use copyright precedent that allows non-commerical copying of copyrighted material. In essence, fair use legalized the copying of cassette tapes. Because of the DMCA, that right was eliminated for DVDs because of the fear of internet piracy, which in my opinion has had no effect.

As I said, Congress has considered reforming the policy with HR 1201. If you would like to contact your reprsentative, use this website. It takes about thirty seconds to complete.

Tags: , , , &

Loyalty

Andrew Sullivan debates with a reader on people's loyalty to Bush and his lack thereof to them unless they're obsequious.

He's a Republican too, just not part of the neo-conservative fundamentalist faction. He's the traditional, old school type of Republican who favors limited government, empirical debate, and fiscal responsibility. I miss his kind.

Tags: , , &

March 17, 2006

Syracuse

I hate you. You were supposed to beat Duke for me. My bracket is now completely screwed up. I hope you're happy, you assholes.

UPDATE: This applies to Michigan State too. You suck Paul Davis.

Tags: , , , &

March 15, 2006

Chain

I was checking my account of MySpace today and saw that there were new posts on the bulletin board, which is a place that you can post messages to your friends all at once.

There was an announcement from Risky Business about his band, numerous lame surveys but the one that got my attention was a stupid chain letter from my friend Tiffany. Here's what it said:
Everyone needs to take the time and read this. Just take a break from all your other stupid bulletins about who is gonna die or if your love life will suck for 7 years and be serious and do the right thing. Repost this or you have no soul seriously. A kid needs our help so do the right thing guys and gals.

Hi, my name is Chad Briody. I am 7 years old, and I have a large tumor on my brain and severe lung cancer. The doctors say I will die soon if this isn't fixed, and my family can't pay the bills. "The Make A Wish Foundation" has agreed to donate 7 cents for every time this message is reposted. For those of you who repost, I thank you so much. But for those who don't repost it, I will still pray for you. Please, if you are a kind person, have a heart. Please, please, PLEASE REPOST THIS MESSAGE!

Chad Briody
For Christ's sake, how are people so ridiculously stupid? Seriously, who actually thinks that the Make A Wish Foundation will actually donate money for each time it's posted on MySpace? --- the answer? --- people with the equivalent brain capacity of a retarded armadillo.

Bill Gates is not going to pay you for forwarding emails with his "email tracking program." Foundations will not donate if you post bulletins online. You will not get rich by mailing $5 to the sender of the letter. You will not have eleventy billion years of good luck for mailing letters to fifty of your closest friends within the next twenty-five seconds and you will not have fantastic, mind-blowing sex within four days of forwarding a letter to people.

I like to believe that people are intelligent so why are, well mainly girls, falling for this? I don't know the answer. Also, why is it mainly girls? Are girls just less intelligent? Probably not. They must just be more prone to have a bleeding heart that wants to believe in the ridiculous fallacy that good things will happen without any hard work. Here's a tip, if you want to help out poor Chad, Billy or Sally, donate some time or money to a charity and stop wasting my time with your stupid chain letters.

Tags: , , , , &

March 12, 2006

Pepsi

Well, the Jimmy Fallon/Parker Posey Pepsi commercial has resurfaced. I remember seeing like a year ago or so, and now Pepsi seems to have pulled it out from the storage bin. Its been everywhere lately.

I love this ad. Anything that has absurd quirky public dancing and outrageous face gestures seem to work for me but its the ending that makes me love it so much. Anytime you throw someone up in the air not to come down, and you don't care... ahh, that's comedy gold!

Tags: , ,

Soul

Hemant Mehta, a DePaul University student, recently sold his soul on eBay for $504. The winning bidder, Jim Henderson, is a former evangelical minister. Supposedly he hopes to save the soul and has asked Mehta to attend fifteen church services and write about his experiences.

Beyond my belief, Mehta, a proclaimed atheist, has actually agreed. Unfortunately, no published reports have explained how the deal went from a payment of $504 to attending church services. Wow.

Of course this isn't the first time this has happened. From what I found, another guy sold his soul on eBay back in 2002 for $16.95.

Tags: , , , &

March 11, 2006

MySpace

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart's take on MySpace.
    "On the downside, they're loaded with sexual predators. On the plus side, they're also loaded with sexual prey."
Tags: , , , &

Facebook

Since Depressed Writer is a decroded piece of crap and too lazy to join the community blog and post it himself, here's a hilarious video clip on how Facebook has affected college student's lives. For those of you who aren't into Facebook, just replace the word with MySpace. Actually I don't think that works. You can't stalk on MySpace like you can on Facebook so nevermind, you people won't get it.

By the way, I love the use of Electric Light Orchestra's song, Mr. Blue Sky. I've been obsessed with this song ever since it was featured in a VW Beetle commercial a few years ago.

Here's the creator's website in case anyone cares, which none of you do.

UPDATE: People are having problems with the video clip, so here's one from College Humor.

Tags: , , , &

Forza

A friend of mine has the sickest XBOX setup I've ever seen. He and his roommates are rabid fans of the game, Forza, which is like Gran Turismo for XBOX except that you can damage your car. Unhappy with using controllers, they built a racing setup that mimicked an Indy car.


This setup was better than anything I've ever used in an arcade. They have the F1 style chair, pedals, force-feedback wheel and paddle shifters. I've never had so much fun with my clothes on, save Penn State games and drinking and well lots of stuff. Regardless, this setup is the shit

Tags: , , &

Flash

With Intel's announcement and Samsung's latest product concept at CeBIT, it seems that solid-state hard drive laptops are on the horizon.

In the announcement, Intel has made it clear that NAND flash hard drives will be debuting in laptops within a year. To summarize what this is, NAND flash drives are memory units very similar to ram and usb key chain drives. They have an array of advantages over traditional spinning disc hard drives that we're used to.

The first is that they're non-volatile -- meaning they don't need power to maintain the information, unlike DRAM (the RAM on your motherboard) which purges information in the absence of electricity.

Second, they are much better shock resistance which is a great advantageous for laptops. With NAND flash, premium features such as head locking isn't needed.

Third, the amount of energy required to power these devices is an order of magnitude less than traditional hard drives. This means that batteries in laptops will last a lot longer.

Fourth, the reduced energy requirement and the elimination of mechanical friction heat greatly reduced the heat output of laptops, meaning you won't be burning your legs.

Fifth, these flash chips are similar to DRAM in that information is instantly available. With traditional hard drives, information is seeked -- rather the head has to move back and forth across the disc to access the information "sector" before transferring it to the DRAM and CPU. This means an significant increase in hard drive speeds, and the overall experience should feel "snappier." The time required to open applications and locate and save files should take much less time.

Ok, so what are the disadvantages? Well, there are two main ones. First, these chips are expensive. Second, they have less capacity than traditional drives. Current 32 gigabyte drives are running at $900 a piece, which well sucks. But over the past fews years, flash drives prices have dropped significantly and will continue to do so.

Hopefully by next year, the disadvantages will have been eliminated and I can get my eight hour MacBook laptop that doesn't keep me awake at night because its hard drive loves to "seek" every thirty seconds (it makes noise).

Tags: , , , &

ANWR

Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior and one of the main proponents of drilling in ANWR retired this week. She plans to retire in the mountains of the west but has said that she's glad she is rich enough to be able to live far away from the annoying oil derricks. Ain't that some shit?

I've always been perplexed by supporters of drilling in ANWR. It's not that I'm a true bleeding heart environmentalist but rather that the benefits, by far, do not outweigh the negatives.

Mean value estimates of the amount of oil are 10.4 billion barrels. The US burns 20 million barrels a day. So, drilling in ANWR would only give us 520 days of oil. To me, thats not enough oil to warrant drilling in a national refuge area.

But then again, my campaign contributers aren't the oil industry.

Tags: , , , &

HTTP

I was updating the sidebar to include three new blogs today and I screwed up the address.
    Instead of putting:
    http://thenewconstilibertarionist.blogspot.com/

    I put:
    http://http//thenewconstilibertarionist.blogspot.com/
Luckily, I checked the links to make sure they worked, which this one didn't. The point of this entry isn't the mistake I made but rather what happened when I clicked on the incorrect link. The incorrect link automatically forwarded to Microsoft's website. What the hell is this bullshit? First, why do they get to receive all the screwed up links. Secondly, how did they set this up?

I can understand if I was using Internet Explorer. They could write the code to set this up but I wasn't using it. I was using Firefox. So, if anyone knows, please fill me in. Fuck you Microsoft.

Tags: , , , &

March 09, 2006

Blog

Well, my friends and I are going to be pulling our resources and publishing together at a new blog, called Club 309. It's going to be much more wild and raucous. I plan on still posting any content I create for it over here as well.

Tags:

Sex

Editor's Note: The following is written by Hamburger Madness

You’re at a party at your friend’s place. There’s a girl there who you’ve hung out with several times. Nice, cute, has a decent sense of humor. After a few alcoholic beverages you and said female go back to her place. You end up consummating the night of lust in her bed. Problem is she lies there the whole time produces a few moans and sighs and possibly grabs the dotted outline of where your ass is supposed to be (at least in my case). Still you’re satisfied because sex is sex and this means one less night of masturbation.

Now picture this situation the other way around. Would the female be satisfied? Most likely not (depending on how badly she wants someone in her). In fact all signs point to she’ll tell her friends how bad you were in the sack. Now this is my problem, females believe that they can just lie there and satisfy the man. Where’s the equitability in this when it is an expectation that the man satisfy the woman but not the other way around? And how did we get to this?

Now all the girls are thinking you guys can get off so easy, you have to work to satisfy a woman but you don’t need to really try to get off a man. Well sorry ladies. It isn’t all that fun when you have to concentrate to get off. But then I got to thinking it might be all the masturbating I’ve done in my life (the counter is probably close to 10000 score, give or take a couple hundred) which has probably made it impossible for me to get off easily. However, some girls are actually good in bed and I can just have fun and get off.

Some girls will scratch, bite, slap, ride, gyrate, play with, suck, and work it. And the dearth of these wonderful creatures is partly men’s fault. These girls are commonly called freaks by certain men and many guys automatically think, “she’s one crazy bitch.” So girls end up thinking, “hold back on the freaky shit or become some shriveled up hag with a uterine cyst who’s still unmarried at 43.” But not all guys think like that ladies. I’d say most guys like a girl who can have fun in bed as long as they haven’t had too many jockeys come before them (pun totally intended).

What I am trying to get to is this: ladies, please, suck his nipples, play with his balls, if you get on top, ride that thing, scratch his back, bite his shoulder, slap that ass, grind that cock, but whatever you do don’t lie there on your back and expect him to do everything. I understand guys are supposed to lead but it takes both parties to have some fun, freaky, jungle sex. If he thinks you’re some slut because you want some spice in bed then it’s his loss not yours. Guys, if you want some fun-loving girls in bed, stop calling the fun-loving ones sluts, freaks or whatever demeaning names we call them. I like these magical creatures and both sexes must ensure that they do not become extinct.

Stay tuned for my next blog: penises are not joysticks and just because it is as hard as a rock it doesn’t mean it’s made of granite and invincible to teeth.

Tags: , , , &

Flu

CNN is reporting that a nine year old Chinese girl has died from bird flu. From the article:
    The World Health Organisation (WHO), confirming the Chinese girl's death, said bird flu has infected 175 people, killing 96 of them since 2003.

    Scientists fear it is only a matter of time before the virus mutates into a form that passes easily among people, triggering a pandemic.
So, it's a matter of time before we're all screwed. I just can't wait until it spreads over to the US.

Tags: , , , &

Foreign

I decided to put together a list of my favorite foreign films for the hell of it. So, I put together a top ten list. Anything in the English language is exempt so English, Australian, and Canadian movies don't count. It has to have subtitles. Oh, French-Canadian movies are exempt too -- because they're French-Canadian. Here they are in alphabetical order.
Tags: &

Hamburger

Hamburger Madness has been added as a member to this blog. Hopefully he'll be adding content in the near future.

Tags: &

March 08, 2006

Re-design

A funny video from Google Video about how Microsoft would re-design the Apple iPod's retail box.

Tags: , , , &

Rerun

Two months ago, I did an entry about Loose Change, a documentary detailing how many of the facts about 9/11 don't add up. Basically, the movie says there's a government cover-up and that maybe the Pentagon and Bush administration were the ones behind it. It's crazy I know.

Well, I was searching through Google Video again last night and found a new version of the video called Loose Change, 2nd Edition. It has some overlap but this time provides a lot more evidence about how planes did not hit the Pentagon or crash in Pennsylvania.

Interesting to say the least.

Tags: , , , &

March 07, 2006

Gary

I found an article from The Daily Collegian about Gary Cattell, the born-again christian who preaches every weekday outside of the Willard Building on Penn State's University campus.

Cattell is an interesting guy. Although I disagree with almost everything he says, he is someone I completely respect. Why? I respect him because he adds civilized discourse and debate to the campus and makes people question their beliefs.

Tags: , , , &

Math

Wayne:     I wish I was a math major
Me:           eww... math major... eww
Wayne:     lol, it's what I'm best at
Me:           you are asian
Wayne:     yep, it's our forte
Me:           no doubt
Wayne:     why is it that asians seem to be born good at math
Me:           its not that asians are better. i think its the language barrier. every teacher i had for math was russian and couldn't speak english at all. i just think people who can't speak english are drawn into math and physics -- foreigners.

Tags: , , &

March 06, 2006

Replacement

There has been some gossip about Rick Wagoner lately. Many think he may be preparing to resign as the head of General Motors. And why not, there are plenty of reasons for him to hang it up.
  • $8.6 billion lost last year
  • Declining market share
  • The Pontiac Aztek
  • Poor stock performance
  • A plummeting corporate image
So, if this is true, who's going to replace him? It definitely won't be Lutz, the "car czar." He's in no position to be CEO. He's much better off where he currently is. There's speculation that it could be Jerry York, Kirk Kerkorian's right-hand man. Kirk Kerkorian currently is GM's largest shareholder and a strong vocal critic demanding change in the company. Jerry York could be a good thing for GM, but he's not the best. I hereby proclaim that Mr. T should takeover as the Chief Executive Officer of the largest corporation in the world.


Here are the reasons why I think he's the best choice:
  • Have you seen the A-Team? He can build specialized cars from scratch. Should there be a strike, he could run an entire plant by himeself.
  • He's for education - He tells kids to stay in school. This translates into more R&D
  • He's for a healthy living style - He tells kids drink their milk. A healthy living style decreases healthcare costs, something currently hurting GM
  • He's a strong advocate against flying, which could boost car sales
  • He wouldn't need his own bodyguards - he used to be one for Muhammed Ali, Michael Jackson, and Diana Ross
  • He wouldn't need a company car - He has his GMC Van
  • If any more deficits occur at GM, he could just sell some of his gold chains
  • He pities the fool aka the UAW
  • His experience making motivational movies could inspire the GM workforce
  • The street cred he gained from his 1984 rap album could be marketed toward the urban demographic
  • He likes the straight talk - often heard saying "Quit yo jibber-jabber"
  • His work as a minister could get God on GM's side
Jerry York can't touch these credentials.

Tags: , , &

Stuck

From an automotive media event in Bulgaria, this picture is courtesy of DaimlerChrysler... obviously not Land Rover. For the uninformed -- the vehicle on the left is a Jeep Grand Cherokee and the one on the right, stuck in the mud, is a Land Rover LR3.


Reminds me of when I was interning with GM and doing testing in Death Valley. A Dodge Durango's brakes and front quarter-panel had caught on fire. The idiot driver pulled over at a gas station and parked waaay too close to a gas pump. The station owner came out screaming his head off. Luckily, the fire was put out pretty quickly by a Ford engineer who happened to have a fire extinguisher nearby (Mind you, it was caused by a bad thermocouple, not a brake issue). Everyone (Toyota, Honda, Ford, GM, Land Rover, and I think BMW engineers) had a great laugh at Dodge's tragedy. I wish I had gotten a picture.

Tags: , , , &

Jersey

The New Jersey legislature has decided to further limit personal freedoms. They have put forth a bill requiring websites to collect the names and addresses of users in public forums -- effectively banning anonymous speech.

Now, everyone who knows me knows I hate anonymous douches but I do believe that they should never be banned. The reason? I ignore anything that an anonymous douche says. Being anonymous means you're too much of a pussy to say it publicly and put your reputation behind it. It doesn't warrant any respect and most people, I think, have the same opinion. But, that doesn't mean it should be banned. Free speech is not limited by who is saying it, so why should it be limited by who is anonymously saying it?

Furthermore, who is going to perform a background check to see if the given name and addresses are real. How many George W. Bush's living at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave will they see? Also, the only solution that I can see for the website operator is ... "Oops, my server hard drive crashed."

Thank you New Jersey to limiting our speech. What's going to be next Big Brother? The Internet is the single greatest device for free speech and anonymous speech and it should continue that way. New Jersey, you're a collective idiot.

Tags: , , , , &

March 05, 2006

McClellan

I actually feel sorry for Scott McClellan. Oh I know, I know, he's a giant douche paid to lie to the White House press corps day in and day out but I truly do feel sorry for him. Unlike Ari Fleischer, you can see the pain in his eyes as he gets roasted by the media.


No matter how cold one might be, lying to the press every single day has to take a toll on you. You know he hates his job. How could he not? You know that no one in the press corps respects him -- he lies to them everyday. You know the administration doesn't respect him -- they make him lie everyday.

Here's to you Scott. May you be able to repent and recover after your term is over.

Tags: , &

Bankruptcy

An interesting article on how bankruptcy could be good for General Motors. It briefly discusses it's problems and rightfully lambasts the unions that have put a stranglehold on it and it's supply chain (Delphi and others).

Tags: , , , &

Earthlink

Have you seen Earthlink's current commercials? I'm talking about the ones with dwarfs, giants, fairies and such characters. I don't know about you, but these commercials are just downright eerie.

But then again, what can you expect from a company that has been claimed to be just a front organization for Scientology? The company was founded in 1994 by Sky Dayton and Reed Slatkin. Both are very vocal members within Scientology. It's been claimed by outsiders and insiders that they scan and filter user emails, block certain information, and promote Scientology within their organization. All of these actions are of course legal but nonetheless reason enough to never use their service.

Tags: , , , &

Response

Moderate Islam has finally shown itself to the world. A recent public display in Bahrain, an island nation in the Persian Gulf, has shown that moderate muslims greatly disagree with the people who use Islam to justify their terrorism.


One of the chants used during the protest, "No Sunni, No Shia, We are all against exclusivists (terrorists)" is very uplifting and a giant step forward in the world of extreme Islamists. It's a giant step towards what westerners has been demanding -- that rational and moderate muslims speak out against the terrorists. So, why haven't I heard much about this in the mainstream media?

Tags: , , , &

March 04, 2006

Lesbians

Here are some pictures of my brother Dan's friends. I think they're nice girls but they need to cut this shit out. They know they're not lesbians. We know they're not lesbians. So, what the hell is the deal?


Being drunk and hooking up with your best friend at the bar isn't hot. It's a lame attempt at getting noticed by guys. These two are very attractive girls with great personalities but they don't need to resort to this kind of tacky stunt. Personally, it's not a turn-on, but rather something that makes me lose my respect for them. Just because it catches my attention, doesn't mean its a good thing. Plenty of bad things catch my attention -- car accidents for example.


Stop being fake lesbians. Either go all the way and dive into some bearded clam or stop altogether because you're making yourselves look cheap, easy, and desperate. Stupid bitches.

Tags: , , ,

March 03, 2006

Outsourcing

I found a Jib-Jab animation about Wal-Mart and outsourcing here. Enjoy.

Tags: , , ,

March 02, 2006

Counter

I finally got my hit counter to work correctly. Before today, the hit counter would only increment if you viewed the main page. If you accessed the site via an RSS feed or accessed anything but the main archive page, it wouldn't register as a hit. I couldn't get it to work because I had placed my counter on the sidebar, unlike Pineapple, who placed his on the footer.

The footer displays on individual pages and the main page but certain sections of the sidebar do not. So I had to reconfigure some fo the html code. And no one is still reading this anymore.

Tags: , , , &

March 01, 2006

Nader

Ralph Nader, consumer advocate extraordinaire, took aim at the automotive industry again this week. And by automotive industry, when it comes to criticism, just like the media, Nader only means GM, Ford, and sometimes DCX because, as you all know -- Toyota, Honda, and Nissan are perfect.

Nader claims that the Big Three (which would actually include Toyota as the third but he doesn't mean that) have created a "dark age" in the industry because of a deliberate neglect of innovation. He gave no examples for this claim.

Next, he went on to talk about big losses for Ford and GM lately and is amazed that no one has called for the head of Wagoner or Ford. Good point. I've wondered the same thing.

Then, he moved onto a lame attack of SUVs. He lambasted the Big Three for relying on the higher profit margins of gigantic "profitable junk" as their market share diminished. I'm sorry but how is this a problem? People wanted SUVs. The Big Three built them. SUVs were bought. That's how capitalism works. Corporations follow market needs. If you want someone to blame SUVs for -- blame the people who bought them. Besides how is this a domestic issue? Foreign automakers have been coming out in full force with large, fuel inefficient ugly SUVs the past five years. Where's the outrage for the "profitable junk" that they make? Oh right, you won't see it.

Now the ever popular argument that domestic cars get poor fuel economy. He made the claim that the domestics have neglected to improve fuel efficiency. Well, with the exception of the Prius (which is the ugliest thing this side of an Aztek and handle worse than SUVs), so has everyone else (the Honda Insight is not a car -- its a tricycle with an engine). As for hybrids in general, everyone is scrambling to get the technology out. Ford has a hybrid midsize SUV, and GM will have a hybrid car, SUV and truck in the next year. Nissan still doesn't have one either.

Also, I'm sick of the assumption that foreign automakers have better fuel economy in normal vehicles. But, I guess if you repeat a lie enough, people will begin to believe it. Here's some proof against this lie.


So, where's the article that says foreign automakers have neglected innovation? Oh thats right, you won't find it because they are the darlings of the media. By the way, GM has had hybrid technology in its buses for quite sometime. Secondly, like a lot of people, I have reservations about hybrids because of their batteries. Will they last the lifetime of the car? If they die, how expensive will it be, because it'll be out of warranty by then? How much of an environmental impact will these batteries have when they are disposed of? Batteries are horrible things for the environment, but don't tell Cameron Diaz that. She might shit herself. But, I digress.

The last thing I want to bring up about Nader is the statement "Our government has the authority and the tools to move [innovation] into the assembly lines and the dealer showrooms." I'm sorry but that's a horrible plan. I believe in a free market. I believe that the market should dictate what corporations produce, not old hippies that think they're enlightened and know better because they drive a Prius. Mr. Nader, if you want government controlled industry - please move to China.

Tags: , , , , &

Dodge

My dad sent me a supposedly cancelled Dodge television advertisement. Check it out here. Thanks dad.

Ash

Today is Ash Wednesday, the first day of Lent. Yes! I can't wait. Only forty days until certain sects of Christians can blame Jews for the Romans killing Jesus.


Now here's a question. Why is Lent referred to as forty days? Its not forty days -- it's forty-four. It's only forty days if you do not include Sundays. Why would you not include Sundays? Silly Calendar.

To celebrate the day, here are four things I won't be doing:
    1. Going to church
    2. Getting ashes
    3. Giving up something for lent
    4. Refraining from eating meat
My parents will not approve and someone will probably tell me I'm going to hell. Eh, its hard to get me worried about hell when I don't believe in it. Should I be wrong, at least it'll have a nice barbeque.

Tags: , , , &